The end of Rwanda’s trials: The power of international justice
On the 20th of May, the United Nations courts held their final session on the 1994 Rwandan genocide, as reported by AP News.
Félicien Kabuga was a primary defendant in this case, accused of financing and arming the genocide, but he passed on the 16th of May while in UN custody before his trial could conclude.
Arrested in 2020 in France after evading capture for nearly two decades, Kabuga died 6 years to the date of his arrest held in the UN’s detention facility in The Hague. Kabuga never stood trial for his alleged crimes as his cognitive health declined with the onset of his dementia, with no country willing to take him in, prolonging the case.
This placed him in a ‘legal limbo’: unfit to stand trial, and unfit to make significant journeys while no nearby countries offered asylum.
Upon concluding the final session, the Presiding Judge Iain Bonomy claimed this was a “truly historic milestone”. Although somewhat celebrated in court, Kabuga’s death represented a different meaning entirely to the public, signifying the deficiencies of legal processes. Survivors of the Rwandan genocide expressed their desire for true justice that equated his crimes and the pain they caused.
The head of IBUKA, an organisation representing survivors of the Rwandan Genocide, conveyed a somewhat similar sentiment, emphasising that while Kabuga died without being tried, “history is the true judge”. IBUKA has been significant in offering survivor support through counselling and aid, preserving the history of the genocide, and advocating for its justice.
The Rwandan Genocide of 1994 is a powerful global symbol of the rippling generational historic impact of colonial division and complacency becoming enabling. The UN’s initial failure to intervene despite early warnings of violence seems to be echoing throughout time here, as bureaucratic limitations incapacitate their judicial power.
The proceedings concerning Kabuga were the last of them at the UN-run body that overtook the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda after it shut down in 2015. Following this, the International Criminal Court became a permanent worldwide court to prosecute crimes against humanity without needing to individually establish a tribunal per conflict.
However, the ICC itself faces challenges of its authority, namely from Trump’s sanctions, that can undermine international justice and accountability in the most abhorrent crimes.
The US sanctions came three months after the ICC’s 2024 warrants for the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as other Israeli officials, for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the ongoing genocide of Gaza. The ICC itself called these sanctions a “clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution”.
While bodies such as the ICC can be powerful in officially naming injustice, their power faces attempts at subversion, bringing rise to anxieties about genocidal history repeating itself in the context of Palestine.
AP News, Maghrebi.org
Want to chase the pulse of North Africa?
Subscribe to receive our FREE weekly PDF magazine
